stb_truetype: rename internal symbol equal() to stbtt__equal() - #1901
Open
sleeptightAnsiC wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
stb_truetype: rename internal symbol equal() to stbtt__equal()#1901sleeptightAnsiC wants to merge 1 commit into
sleeptightAnsiC wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
...in order to avoid potential symbol conflicts. Fixes: nothings#1898 Origin: Immediate-Mode-UI/Nuklear#905 Co-authored-by: Robert Winkler <rob121618@gmail.com>
RobLoach
approved these changes
Mar 8, 2026
RobLoach
left a comment
RobLoach
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Using this change in Nuklear without issue.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes: #1898
See linked issue and/or commit message for more info.
(PR template encourages to put a name into credits, but I decided not to. It's barely two lines, and the original author didn't show any intent to upstream this patch. Commit already tracks everyone involved)