Create videos nip#1241
Conversation
|
This is 200x better than the other video NIP. |
v0l
left a comment
v0l
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks ok, but it kinda sucks that there are a bunch of people publishing videos on the other nip and all those will be abandoned.
There are over 750 when i checked
| The following tags are optional: | ||
|
|
||
| - `i` is an external GUID in the format defined [here](https://github.com/MerryOscar/nips/commit/280eb498e0ac56b8f9356c1b7a88cc8b31579801). | ||
| - `c` is the video's value as defined by a given category. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is a c tag? Never seen it used before
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It's pulled from the audio NIP this was based on. It would be the equivalent to something like youtube's categories.
|
|
||
| - `i` is an external GUID in the format defined [here](https://github.com/MerryOscar/nips/commit/280eb498e0ac56b8f9356c1b7a88cc8b31579801). | ||
| - `c` is the video's value as defined by a given category. | ||
| - `website` is an external url to a website related to the video. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Not sure why you would need this, seems more likely its something you would link inside content
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Again, pulled from audio, based on use cases provided by wavlake and fountain. So it might not transfer over, but could be useful. I can simplify the NIP for the short term.
It does suck. I wouldn't propose this NIP if the other one had a story for associating multiple files with a single video. It seems like you'd want your download url to be different from your streaming url, at least that's how the stemstr guys did their audio stuff. But you'd know better than me, I haven't worked with streaming video at all. Am I seeing problems that don't exist? |
|
I mean you could have just put more So in the case of videos with multiple resolutions you can have multiple I just deployed the NIP-71 styles videos to https://zap.stream/videos |
|
Alright, your implementation is a stronger vote than my uneducated alternative NIP. Closing in favor of #923 |
4 participants
No description provided.