Skip to content

Open Corepack Vote #1527

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Mar 10, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
12 changes: 8 additions & 4 deletions votes/initiateNewVote/_EDIT_ME.yml
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@

# 1. Select a subject for the vote. This can be a question addressed to the TSC
# voting members.
subject: REPLACEME
subject: Should Corepack stay in the Node.js distribution?

# 2. You can leave the header instructions as is, or modify them if you see fit.
headerInstructions: |
Expand All @@ -24,8 +24,11 @@ headerInstructions: |
# voters express their preference for each candidates, no matter how many
# there are.
candidates:
- TODO
- TODO
- "Status Quo: keep distributing Corepack with Node.js, experimental and disabled (i.e. only the `corepack` executable in the distribution), exactly as it is today."
- "Stable and Disabled: keep distributing Corepack disabled (i.e. only the `corepack` executable in the distribution), and mark it stable in a future release line."
- "Stable and Enabled: keep distributing Corepack with Node.js, enabled (i.e. `corepack`, `pnpm`, and `yarn` executables in the distribution), and mark it stable in a future release line."
- "Phase out: stop distributing Corepack (i.e. the distribution will no longer contain a `corepack` executable) on future release lines of Node.js – existing release lines will keep it as experimental."
- "Phase out later: stop distributing Corepack (i.e. the distribution will no longer contain a `corepack` executable) on future (i.e. 25+) release lines of Node.js – existing release lines as well as the very next (i.e. 24.x) will keep it as experimental."

# 4. Pass the following to false if it's important to keep the candidates in the
# order you define above. Presenting candidates in a fixed order tends to
Expand All @@ -35,7 +38,8 @@ canShuffleCandidates: true
# 5. Insert here a short description of the vote objectives and link to the
# issue it was discussed on to give the full context.
footerInstructions: |
TBD
The objective of the vote is to determine the strategy for Corepack’s distribution
in future Node.js releases.

# 6. Optionally, insert a brief introduction for the vote PR, in the markdown format.
prBody: |
Expand Down