Skip to content

Conversation

GVodyanov
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@GVodyanov GVodyanov self-assigned this Sep 22, 2025
@GVodyanov GVodyanov requested a review from hamza221 as a code owner September 22, 2025 08:21
@GVodyanov GVodyanov added the 3. to review Waiting for reviews label Sep 22, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 22, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 67.73%. Comparing base (796e0c9) to head (ebfe7fe).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##               main    #4732       +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage     10.75%   67.73%   +56.97%     
  Complexity      291      291               
=============================================
  Files           128       26      -102     
  Lines          6515      877     -5638     
  Branches       1192        0     -1192     
=============================================
- Hits            701      594      -107     
+ Misses         5692      283     -5409     
+ Partials        122        0      -122     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@GVodyanov GVodyanov force-pushed the fix/rename-feature-circles-to-teams branch from fd79c30 to ebfe7fe Compare September 22, 2025 10:44
@SebastianKrupinski SebastianKrupinski merged commit ab1689b into main Sep 22, 2025
47 of 49 checks passed
@SebastianKrupinski SebastianKrupinski deleted the fix/rename-feature-circles-to-teams branch September 22, 2025 11:32
@SebastianKrupinski
Copy link
Contributor

@GVodyanov this probably needs back ports, but which versions?

@GVodyanov
Copy link
Contributor Author

@GVodyanov this probably needs back ports, but which versions?

Well this is just a github thing and not in our release process so no backports necessary

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
3. to review Waiting for reviews
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants