Rename response_schema to response_json_schema

[cognition9144]

Description

The upstream has updated the field name to response_json_schema, where it supports additional fields, such as additionalProperties. Therefore, it will fix issues like pydantic/pydantic-ai#3517 in a similar way as https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-ai/pull/3517/files

PR Type

🐛 Bug Fix

Relevant issues

Fixes #541.

Checklist

• I have added unit tests that prove my fix/feature works
• New and existing tests pass locally
• Documentation was updated where necessary
• I have read and followed the contribution guidelines```

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/any_llm/providers/gemini/base.py	0.00%	1 Missing ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
src/any_llm/providers/gemini/base.py	64.75% <0.00%> (-22.14%)	⬇️

... and 41 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[daavoo]

hi @cognition9144 , thanks for the contribution. The change doesn't as expected.

I am fine with using the new response_json_schema but you can't pass a pydantic BaseModel directly as in this PR.

I also don't think that this fixes #547 as the code only sets response_json_schema if the value passed is a pydantic class. In order to fix that issue we should update the code to also accept an input json and pass it as response_json_schema.

So, if you could please:

• Update to convert the BaseModel to a valid input for response_json_schema.
• Update to support raw JSON as input.
• Add corresponding tests.

See https://github.com/mozilla-ai/any-llm/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.md