Skip to content

Conversation

Jintao-Huang
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Jintao-Huang, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a bug in the json_parse_to_dict utility function where the JSON repair mechanism was inadvertently triggered even when the function was called with strict=False. The modification ensures that the repair attempt is now correctly conditional on the strict parameter, aligning the function's behavior with its intended design and preventing unnecessary processing in non-strict parsing scenarios.

Highlights

  • Conditional JSON Repair: The logic to repair malformed JSON strings using json_repair.repair_json is now only executed when the strict parameter is set to True.
  • Refined strict=False Behavior: When strict is False and the initial JSON parsing fails, the function will no longer attempt to repair the string, instead proceeding to return the original value without modification or warning.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes a bug in json_parse_to_dict. Previously, when strict=False, an invalid JSON string would undergo a repair attempt, and if that still resulted in invalid JSON, a modified (repaired) string might be returned instead of the original. The new logic correctly attempts repair only when strict=True, ensuring the original string is returned when parsing fails in non-strict mode. I have one suggestion to improve the error logging for better debugging.

f"the string before and after repair are '{old_value}' | '{value}'")
value = json.loads(value)
except Exception:
logger.error(f"Unable to parse json string: '{value}', and try to repair failed")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better debugging, it's helpful to log the original malformed JSON string that caused the failure, instead of the potentially modified value. Using old_value here would make the log message more consistent and informative, as it would always point to the initial problematic input.

Suggested change
logger.error(f"Unable to parse json string: '{value}', and try to repair failed")
logger.error(f"Unable to parse json string: '{old_value}', and try to repair failed")

@Jintao-Huang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

#5995

#5804

@Jintao-Huang
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/gemini review

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces several bug fixes across the codebase. The primary change in json_parse_to_dict correctly restricts JSON repair attempts to strict mode only, which clarifies its behavior. Other improvements include reordering argument initialization and saving in sft.py for correctness, and adjusting argument precedence during model conversion in convert.py. The documentation for rope_scaling has also been updated. Overall, these changes enhance the robustness and correctness of the code. I have one suggestion to improve the logging in json_parse_to_dict for better error diagnostics.

f"the string before and after repair are '{old_value}' | '{value}'")
value = json.loads(value)
except Exception:
logger.error(f"Unable to parse json string: '{value}', and try to repair failed")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

For better debugging, it would be more helpful to log the original malformed string (old_value) that failed to be repaired, instead of the repaired string (value). This will show exactly what input caused the repair to fail.

Suggested change
logger.error(f"Unable to parse json string: '{value}', and try to repair failed")
logger.error(f"Unable to parse json string: '{old_value}', and try to repair failed")

@Jintao-Huang Jintao-Huang merged commit 9fce30c into modelscope:main Sep 28, 2025
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants