Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

94 Commits

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

A circular emblem showing a fairy conductor raising a baton as musical notes drift upward

Agentic Development Kit for GitHub Copilot

A GitHub-native, Copilot-app-first Human-on-the-Loop control harness for agentic software development.

CI status MIT License

GitHub Copilot agents run bounded inner loops: they plan, implement, test, repair, and return evidence. Humans stay on the outer loop: they set intent and risk policy, observe durable state, intervene on exceptions, and retain agreement, acceptance, and merge authority.

This kit turns GitHub into the shared control surface:

  • Issues hold work orders, plans, dependencies, escalations, and outcomes.
  • Copilot app sessions provide the nested execution and supervision tree.
  • Worktrees, branches, and pull requests isolate implementation work.
  • Checks and evidence tables make completion claims testable.
  • Rulesets and governance sensors expose delegation boundaries.
  • Retrospectives improve the loop itself, not only the latest output.

It does not replace Scrum, Kanban, Waterfall, or your delivery lifecycle. It adds a control layer for delegating work without making chat history, model memory, or agent self-report the source of truth.

Important

The complete orchestration model is designed around the GitHub Copilot app. Nested parent/child sessions, the multi-session sidebar, isolated worktrees, and session-control tools are part of the operating model.

A bounded implementation Task may occasionally be handed off to another suitable environment, but those environments are not interchangeable runtimes for the complete lifecycle.

How it works

Human-on-the-Loop overview of the Agentic Development Kit, with GitHub Copilot app as the primary runtime and GitHub as the durable control surface

The Copilot app runs the nested execution hierarchy. GitHub holds the durable state. Humans supervise intent, risk, exceptions, and acceptance from the outer loop.

Project session
└─ Epic #<n> orchestrator session
   └─ Task #<n> supervisor session
      └─ PR #<n> worker session

The Project session supervises the complete Epic set for one repository-level initiative. It is unrelated to a GitHub Projects board.

Session Responsibility
Project Start Epic sessions, watch across phases, and replan the outline
Epic orchestrator Calculate the frontier, dispatch Tasks, monitor, integrate, and replan
Task supervisor Claim, plan, apply risk gates, create the worker, verify, escalate, and record the outcome
PR worker Implement, test, repair, commit, and update one PR inside its ownership boundary

Project and Epic sessions conduct; they do not implement.

Why this exists

Without a harness, agent work becomes hard to see, decisions scatter across sessions, and delegation boundaries remain vague.

A completion claim therefore needs durable answers: which Task ran, which PR contains the change, which checks passed, what remains uncertain, and who has authority to accept it.

Session history is useful transport, but it is not shared, authoritative project state. Anything that must outlive one execution lands on GitHub.

Trust attaches to a bounded Task, owned paths, deterministic checks, evidence, and escalation paths—not to a model name or an agent's confidence.

Human-on-the-Loop by design

Human-on-the-Loop (HOTL) means routine work can proceed without a human approving every tool call, while the human remains able to observe, stop, redirect, reject, or accept the work.

Mode Typical trigger Human role
Human-on-the-Loop Normal, bounded, reversible work Observe durable state and intervene on exceptions
Human-in-the-Loop risk:high, ambiguity, scope drift, irreversible action Approve or decide before work continues
Human-in-Command Agreements, governance exceptions, acceptance, merge Retain authority and accountability

The normal path is HOTL. The process returns to HITL when risk, ambiguity, or evidence quality requires it.

Three governance merges

Merge What becomes authoritative
Agreement merge Distilled context becomes reviewed project truth
License merge Onboarding evidence establishes delegation readiness
Completion merge A Task PR is accepted because its evidence supports the acceptance criteria

“License” means delegation readiness, not the repository's legal license. Humans may also intervene through needs:human, needs:replan, failed checks, review comments, or the risk:high gate.

Core disciplines and loops

Discipline Rule
record-before-report Write the durable Issue or PR record before sending a session message
verify-before-done Cite current ground truth—not memory
single-writer Parallel Tasks own disjoint paths; otherwise serialize them
escalate-don't-guess Ambiguity, contradiction, blockage, or scope drift returns to a human or replanning path

The full operating constitution lives in AGENTS.md.

Worker loop:   edit → test → observe → repair
Task loop:     claim → plan → dispatch → verify → outcome
Epic loop:     frontier → dispatch → integrate → replan
Project loop:  start phase → watch across Epics → replan
Learning loop: friction → retro → mechanism → future improvement

This is Loop Engineering: improve the harness around the agent, not only the prompt. Repeated failures become instructions, Skills, templates, tests, or CI guards. General improvements can be upstreamed to this scaffold.

Lifecycle

Phase What happens Human role
0. Onboard Inventory, validate commands, tune the scaffold, draft Epics, and open an evidence PR Review and merge delegation readiness
1. Collect Land raw information with provenance Provide or approve sources
2. Distill and agree Promote durable decisions into requirements, ADRs, glossary entries, and non-goals Approve the agreement merge
3. Plan and orchestrate Build a rolling-wave Issue graph and calculate the actionable frontier Set goals, priorities, constraints, and exceptions
4. Route and execute Keep supervision in the app and run each implementation worker in the appropriate environment Stay on the loop; approve risk-gated work
5. Verify and learn Run checks, review evidence, accept or replan, and promote repeated friction Accept, reject, redirect, or approve a retro

One Task, end to end

  1. Create a Task Issue with objective, acceptance criteria, out-of-scope boundary, file ownership, verification, routing, and handoff notes.
  2. The Epic orchestrator opens a dedicated Task supervisor session.
  3. The supervisor claims the Task and records the plan.
  4. A risk:high Task pauses for approval; ordinary work proceeds through lazy consensus.
  5. The supervisor creates one active implementation worker.
  6. The worker implements and verifies one pull request.
  7. The supervisor independently checks the PR, diff, checks, ownership, and evidence against current GitHub state.
  8. A human accepts, redirects, or rejects the work; repeated friction enters the retro loop.
The Epic set     = one Project session
One Epic Issue   = one Epic orchestrator session
One Task Issue   = one Task supervisor session
One pull request = one active worker + one worktree + one branch

A declared trivial Task may use the Task-supervisor no-worker exemption. Project and Epic conductors may not.

The full control hierarchy remains in the Copilot app. When an implementation Task requires a different environment, the Task may be handed off while its Issue and pull request remain authoritative. See task-routing.

Quick start

Prerequisites

  • a GitHub repository;
  • the GitHub Copilot app;
  • authenticated gh;
  • jq;
  • Git and Bash 3.2 or later;
  • on Windows, Git for Windows.

Availability depends on GitHub and Copilot plans, repository visibility, and organization policy. Check the official GitHub Copilot documentation for current requirements.

Public repositories work on any GitHub plan; private repositories require a paid plan because setup-sources.sh fails closed for private repositories on GitHub Free.

1. Install

Run the installer from the root of a new or existing Git repository.

macOS / Linux

curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot/main/.github/scripts/scaffold-init.sh | bash

Windows PowerShell

irm https://raw.githubusercontent.com/mochan-tk/agentic-dev-kit-for-copilot/main/.github/scripts/scaffold-init.ps1 | iex

On Windows, the bootstrap locates Git Bash from Git for Windows and runs the same canonical installer used on macOS and Linux.

The installer stages files but does not commit them, refuses unexpected collisions and symlinked paths, and records the resolved scaffold revision.

Land the adoption commit on the remote default branch before onboarding.

After installation, run scaffold Bash scripts on Windows through the included launcher:

pwsh .github/scripts/run.ps1 tuning-status.sh

2. Onboard in the Copilot app

Run project-onboarding.

It inventories the repository, verifies commands, tunes the scaffold, drafts phase Epics, opens one evidence PR, and creates the top-level session named Project.

Review and merge the evidence PR—the license merge. Onboarding is complete when this succeeds on the merged default branch:

bash .github/scripts/tuning-status.sh

On Windows:

pwsh .github/scripts/run.ps1 tuning-status.sh

3. Start the Project session

Tell the Project session to start after the onboarding PR merges. It opens the first actionable Epic session, which decomposes the phase into bounded Task Issues.

4. Close the first loop

Dispatch one Task, review its evidence-bearing PR, accept or redirect it, and record repeated friction through the retro Skill.

Governance and safety

The kit includes read-only sensors for Task ownership overlap, effective branch governance, and governance drift after upgrades. Ruleset changes remain explicit adopter actions.

UNKNOWN and UNCHECKABLE are non-success states, not permission to proceed.

See:

Note

This is a repository-level harness, not a complete runtime control plane. Repository files cannot truthfully provide immutable runtime roles, authenticated session-transition events, heartbeats, budgets, circuit breakers, universal pause/resume/cancel, or a unified supervision console.

Issue #6: Ritual wall threat model tracks the authenticity and freshness limits of comment-based ritual evidence.

Documentation

Topic Source
Operating constitution AGENTS.md
Project onboarding project-onboarding
Planning and frontier plan-management
Session hierarchy and Task ritual session-orchestration
Worker routing task-routing
Evidence and completion gates verification
Learning and upstreaming retro
Version and upgrades SCAFFOLD-CHANGELOG.md

This project is not a replacement for your delivery methodology, a hosted autonomous runtime, or a guarantee that agent-generated code is correct. It is a versioned harness for deciding what may be delegated, under which constraints, with which evidence, and where humans retain authority.

Contributing

Use the same process the scaffold defines: bounded Task, explicit ownership, plan before implementation, one active worker, evidence before completion, and retro for repeated friction. Start with AGENTS.md.

License

Licensed under the MIT License.

About

Agentic development lifecycle for GitHub Copilot — the plan, the work, the evidence, and the lessons all live on GitHub, not in chat windows.

Topics

Resources

Stars

2 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages