Conversation
🦋 Changeset detectedLatest commit: 08d1672 The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump. This PR includes changesets to release 0 packagesWhen changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are. Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR |
Summary of ChangesHello @AStaroverov, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request implements a substantial refactoring of the project's internal structure, transitioning to a more organized monorepo layout under Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request is a large-scale structural refactoring that reorganizes the project into a monorepo structure with a packages directory. Many files and directories have been moved or deleted, including documentation and playground applications. The Codecov configuration has also been updated. While the file moves seem consistent with the goal, I've left a comment on the codecov.yml file regarding the removal of per-component coverage reporting, which might reduce visibility on test coverage across different parts of the application.
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The individual_components section has been removed. This will stop Codecov from reporting coverage for the ui, backend, and desktop components separately, which can reduce visibility into the test coverage of different parts of the codebase.
If this is unintentional, consider updating the paths to match the new project structure instead of removing the component definitions. For example, the paths for backend and desktop components could be updated to their new locations within the packages/ directory to retain per-component coverage reporting.
No description provided.