Validate machine response against swagger spec. #515
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
majst01
reviewed
Mar 21, 2024
Contributor
Author
|
For some fields we were lucky before because we returned directly what was returned from the RethinkDB, which never returns |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We often produce responses with our server that are not valid against the Swagger spec. For Go clients this seems not to be a big issue as type safety is guaranteed and it's not possible to produce server responses that violate type constraints. For other clients like Python there are much stricter validations though.
Our main problem that we made is to declare arrays without
omitempty, which for Go Clients does not matter but for other languages it might be problematic.This PR is non-breaking for Go Clients.