Skip to content

Fix mismatch between FEASGM-style normalization and SGM-based privacy accounting - #838

Open
albonec wants to merge 1 commit into
meta-pytorch:mainfrom
albonec:819-fix
Open

Fix mismatch between FEASGM-style normalization and SGM-based privacy accounting#838
albonec wants to merge 1 commit into
meta-pytorch:mainfrom
albonec:819-fix

Conversation

@albonec

@albonec albonec commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Types of changes

  • [ x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Docs change / refactoring / dependency upgrade

Motivation and Context / Related issue

x

mismatch between FEASGM-style normalization and SGM-based privacy accounting

How Has This Been Tested (if it applies)

Checklist

  • [ x] The documentation is up-to-date with the changes I made.
  • [ x] I have read the CONTRIBUTING document and completed the CLA (see CONTRIBUTING).
  • [ x] All tests passed, and additional code has been covered with new tests.

Fixes #819

@meta-cla meta-cla Bot added the CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed. label Jul 13, 2026
@albonec albonec changed the title more small fixes Fix mismatch between FEASGM-style normalization and SGM-based privacy accounting Jul 13, 2026
@meta-codesync

meta-codesync Bot commented Jul 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

This pull request has been imported. If you are a Meta employee, you can view this in D111738649. (Because this pull request was imported automatically, there will not be any future comments.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

CLA Signed This label is managed by the Facebook bot. Authors need to sign the CLA before a PR can be reviewed.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Potential mismatch between FEASGM-style normalization and SGM-based privacy accounting

1 participant