feat(taps): Abstract streams by edgarrmondragon · Pull Request #2888 · meltano/sdk

edgarrmondragon · 2025-02-26T05:14:17Z

Summary by Sourcery

Add support for abstract streams, which are not included in the catalog.

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://meltano-sdk--2888.org.readthedocs.build/en/2888/

sourcery-ai · 2025-02-26T05:14:21Z

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request introduces an __abstract__ flag to the Stream class, allowing developers to define abstract streams that do not generate catalog entries. The _singer_catalog method in Tap was updated to exclude streams with this flag set to True. The selected property was also updated to return True if the stream is abstract and has selected descendents.

Updated class diagram for the Stream class

classDiagram
  class Stream {
    +selected_by_default: bool
    +__abstract__: bool
    +__init__(tap: Tap, name: str, schema: dict, ...)
    +selected(): bool
  }
  note for Stream "Added __abstract__ flag and updated selected() method"

File-Level Changes

Change	Details	Files
Added an `__abstract__` flag to the `Stream` class to prevent catalog entry generation for abstract streams.	Added an `__abstract__` boolean flag to the `Stream` class. Modified the `_singer_catalog` method in `Tap` to exclude streams with `__abstract__` set to `True`. Modified the `selected` property to return `True` if the stream is abstract and has selected descendents.	`singer_sdk/streams/core.py` `singer_sdk/tap_base.py`

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
@sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
(re-)generate the summary at any time.
Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
@sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!
Generate a plan of action for an issue: Comment @sourcery-ai plan on
an issue to generate a plan of action for it.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
Change the review language.
Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Contact our support team for questions or feedback.
Visit our documentation for detailed guides and information.
Keep in touch with the Sourcery team by following us on X/Twitter, LinkedIn or GitHub.

codecov · 2025-02-26T05:16:44Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 91.66667% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 91.94%. Comparing base (0904dc0) to head (653904d).
⚠️ Report is 569 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
singer_sdk/streams/core.py	91.66%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2888      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   91.93%   91.94%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          62       62              
  Lines        5295     5302       +7     
  Branches      681      683       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         4868     4875       +7     
  Misses        299      299              
  Partials      128      128

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

codspeed-hq · 2025-02-26T05:17:29Z

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #2888 will not alter performance

_{Comparing edgarrmondragon/feat/abstract-streams (653904d) with main (0904dc0)}

Summary

✅ 8 untouched benchmarks

ReubenFrankel · 2025-02-27T13:49:06Z

                        raise

-                    if selected:
+                    if not self.__abstract__ and selected:


Suggested change

if not self.__abstract__ and selected:

if not selected:

Personally, I would remove the redundant assignment

selected = self.selected

above for clarity. Then this becomes

Suggested change

if not self.__abstract__ and selected:

if not self.selected:

as below.

ReubenFrankel · 2025-02-27T13:49:40Z


        # Send a SCHEMA message to the downstream target:
-        if self.selected:
+        if not self.__abstract__ and self.selected:


Suggested change

if not self.__abstract__ and self.selected:

if not self.selected:

ReubenFrankel · 2025-02-27T13:55:58Z

    class MyTap(tap_class):
        def discover_streams(self):
-            return [SelectedStream(self), UnselectedStream(self)]
+            return [SelectedStream(self), UnselectedStream(self), AbstractStream(self)]


Would it be possible to avoid this somehow? As in, auto-discover/instantiate any parent streams that are abstract?

That's a very good point. I'll try to do that.

Think this would relate to #953

ReubenFrankel · 2025-02-27T14:01:30Z

        return Catalog(
            (stream.tap_stream_id, stream._singer_catalog_entry)  # noqa: SLF001
            for stream in self.streams.values()
+            if not stream.__abstract__


Advantages/disadvantages of filtering out abstract streams here vs in self.streams?

ReubenFrankel · 2025-02-27T15:23:25Z

+        def get_records(self, context):  # noqa: ARG002
+            yield {"id": 1}
+            yield {"id": 2}
+
+        def generate_child_contexts(self, record, context):  # noqa: ARG002
+            yield {"pid": record["id"]}


Wondering if there is a better way to support this... It would be good if this could be encapsulated into generate_child_contexts only, but that currently requires at least one record (hence get_records implementation).

feat(taps): Abstract streams

5fc6499

edgarrmondragon added 3 commits February 25, 2025 23:19

Do not require name or schema

73d99e7

Generate a dummy name

747fd6f

Test child stream selection

335404a

edgarrmondragon self-assigned this Feb 26, 2025

edgarrmondragon added the Type/Tap Singer taps label Feb 26, 2025

ReubenFrankel reviewed Feb 27, 2025

View reviewed changes

Merge branch 'main' into edgarrmondragon/feat/abstract-streams

653904d

edgarrmondragon force-pushed the main branch from 8c058c1 to 47232c9 Compare July 31, 2025 22:45

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

feat(taps): Abstract streams#2888

feat(taps): Abstract streams#2888
edgarrmondragon wants to merge 5 commits into
mainfrom
edgarrmondragon/feat/abstract-streams

edgarrmondragon commented Feb 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

sourcery-ai Bot commented Feb 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Interacting with Sourcery

Customizing Your Experience

Getting Help

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Feb 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Feb 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

ReubenFrankel Feb 27, 2025

Uh oh!

ReubenFrankel Feb 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

ReubenFrankel Feb 27, 2025

Uh oh!

ReubenFrankel Feb 27, 2025

Uh oh!

edgarrmondragon Feb 27, 2025

Uh oh!

ReubenFrankel Sep 10, 2025

Uh oh!

ReubenFrankel Feb 27, 2025

Uh oh!

ReubenFrankel Feb 27, 2025

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

	if not self.__abstract__ and self.selected:
	if not self.selected:

Conversation

edgarrmondragon commented Feb 26, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Related

Summary by Sourcery

Uh oh!

sourcery-ai Bot commented Feb 26, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

Updated class diagram for the Stream class

File-Level Changes

Interacting with Sourcery

Customizing Your Experience

Getting Help

Uh oh!

codecov Bot commented Feb 26, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq Bot commented Feb 26, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging #2888 will not alter performance

Summary

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

ReubenFrankel Feb 27, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

edgarrmondragon commented Feb 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

sourcery-ai Bot commented Feb 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codecov Bot commented Feb 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq Bot commented Feb 26, 2025 •

edited

Loading

ReubenFrankel Feb 27, 2025 •

edited

Loading