Conversation
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Great work on this submission! The server logic for parsing, validation, and case conversion is well-implemented. However, one specific requirement is missing, which is why I'm requesting a small change. The task requires that you explicitly set the statusText in your HTTP responses—'OK' for successes and 'Bad request' for errors. Currently, only the status code is being set. You can easily add this by using the three-argument version of res.writeHead(), like so: res.writeHead(statusCode, statusMessage, headers). Please apply this to both your success (200) and error (400) responses. Once that's updated, this will be ready for approval!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Important
Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button2 in the Reviewers tab.
Tip
If you have any comments about this review, please leave a message in the Add a comment section below and mention me with the @mateacademy-ai-mentor tag3.
I will read your message during my next review of your pull request. Please do not reply directly to my comments, as that feature is not supported yet.
Caution
Do not close the pull request until the review is complete. Closing it early can lead to unexpected behavior and disrupt the review process.
Footnotes
src/createServer.js
Outdated
| } | ||
|
|
||
| if (errors.length > 0) { | ||
| res.writeHead(400, { 'Content-Type': 'application/json' }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The requirements state that you must respond with a specific statusText ('Bad request' for errors and 'OK' for success). While writeHead defaults to a similar message, it's important to set it explicitly as requested. You can pass the status message as the second argument: res.writeHead(statusCode, statusMessage, headers). This applies to the success response on line 47 as well.
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
mateacademy-ai-mentor
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Summary
Excellent work on this submission! I am approving your solution as it now meets all the project requirements. You've done a great job implementing all the server functionality, and the validation logic is robust. Thank you for addressing the previous feedback by adding the statusText to your success and error responses. The implementation is now complete and correct. Well done!
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center1. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
Footnotes
2 participants
No description provided.