Skip to content

chore: Revert package.json changes#55

Merged
jamesnrokt merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/revert-package-json-changes
Jan 13, 2026
Merged

chore: Revert package.json changes#55
jamesnrokt merged 1 commit intomainfrom
chore/revert-package-json-changes

Conversation

@jamesnrokt
Copy link
Contributor

Background

  • Revert package.json changes as part of the failed 3.0.0 release

What Has Changed

  • package.json

Screenshots/Video

  • N/A

Checklist

  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.

Additional Notes

  • N/A

Reference Issue (For employees only. Ignore if you are an outside contributor)

  • Closes N/A

@jamesnrokt jamesnrokt requested a review from a team as a code owner January 13, 2026 20:28
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 13, 2026 20:28
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This pull request reverts version numbers from 3.0.0 back to 2.2.4 following a failed release attempt. The changes ensure consistency across package manifests and lock files.

Changes:

  • Reverted version from 3.0.0 to 2.2.4 in package.json and package-lock.json files

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
plugin/package.json Reverted version field from 3.0.0 to 2.2.4
plugin/package-lock.json Reverted version field from 3.0.0 to 2.2.4 in two locations (root and packages)
Kits/Rokt/package.json Reverted version field from 3.0.0 to 2.2.4
Files not reviewed (1)
  • plugin/package-lock.json: Language not supported

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

@jamesnrokt jamesnrokt merged commit db64891 into main Jan 13, 2026
16 checks passed
@jamesnrokt jamesnrokt deleted the chore/revert-package-json-changes branch January 13, 2026 20:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants