make copyright year on front page dynamic#15
Open
carehart wants to merge 1 commit intolucee:masterfrom
Open
Conversation
It was hard-coded as 2015, but should seemingly always be the current year. (This is how US copyright law works. Perhaps it's different in Switzerland, in which case I'll understand if you reject this PR.)
Member
|
great question, i think these days it's pretty much, implicit, but I agree it makes a better impression https://www.perplexity.ai/search/do-copyright-messages-need-a-d-_gqYkoj7R2CZXP4VYwySZQ |
Author
|
Sure, so from that it seems a middle ground would be to put "2015-" and then the current/dynamic year--if 2015 is indeed the founding date for lucee. I just don't recall, and am pressed for time to look for it now. :-) /Charlie Sent via my mobile: please pardon typos
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It was hard-coded as 2015, but should seemingly always be the current year. (This is how US copyright law works. Perhaps it's different in Switzerland, in which case I'll understand if you reject this PR.)