Skip to content

Conversation

@lnliz
Copy link
Contributor

@lnliz lnliz commented Jun 20, 2025

starting v29 bitcoin core uses cmake and not autoconf

@Goro2030
Copy link

Goro2030 commented Jun 20, 2025

Great!! Is the PR approved already?

@Goro2030
Copy link

@nolim1t please review and approve this PR so we can use 0.29!

@lnliz
Copy link
Contributor Author

lnliz commented Jun 26, 2025

@AaronDewes can you help?

@lnliz lnliz mentioned this pull request Jun 28, 2025
@lnliz
Copy link
Contributor Author

lnliz commented Jul 4, 2025

@Goro2030 fwiw, I tired of waiting and created a fork of the repo with docker images for bitcoin core v29.0 28.2 and more

https://github.com/lnliz/docker-bitcoind
https://hub.docker.com/r/lnliz/bitcoind/tags

And I will maintain my repo going forward

@planbetterHQ
Copy link

@nolim1t &|OR @AaronDewes, why not reviewing these PRs? CI is passing and the PR size is not so big. This repo has close to 2M Docker pulls. Let's keep it going!

@willcl-ark
Copy link

FYI, I am maintaining up-to-date docker images over at https://github.com/willcl-ark/bitcoin-core-docker which could be an alternative for you, if things don't get updated here as fast as you'd like.

We have all current versions (and RCs) which on debian base use the guix-built release binaries (as hosted on bitcoincore.org) and on Alpine base try to keep as close as possible to release configuration.

There are also automated nightly/master builds available.

These are not official Bitcoin Core images, but are hosted on dockerhub at the official-looking URL of https://hub.docker.com/r/bitcoin/bitcoin

Perhaps they might be of use to you? :)

@lnliz
Copy link
Contributor Author

lnliz commented Oct 17, 2025

I'm maintaining the drop-in replacement docker images at https://github.com/lnliz/docker-bitcoind with all the latest versions (plus knots and inquisition images)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants