Make validate_mask faster#84
Merged
lukas-lightly merged 1 commit intoJun 1, 2026
Merged
Conversation
np.bincount() is faster than np.unique()
8699a01 to
27625e8
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
Benchmark report by Gemini: Benchmark ResultsSummaryPR 84 demonstrates a significant performance gain, reducing the dataset ingestion time from over 9 minutes to approximately 5.5 minutes. Both runs processed the same number of samples and annotations, confirming the consistency of the benchmark.
|
Contributor
Author
|
/review |
MalteEbner
approved these changes
Jun 1, 2026
Merged
2 tasks
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What has changed and why?
np.bincount() is faster than np.unique()
How has it been tested?
Existing tests