Fix missing ++ operator and duplicate WithU55CTweaks in Protoaccu55cConfig#1
Draft
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
Draft
Fix missing ++ operator and duplicate WithU55CTweaks in Protoaccu55cConfig#1Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
++ operator and duplicate WithU55CTweaks in Protoaccu55cConfig#1Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: learningHWSW <93897328+learningHWSW@users.noreply.github.com> Agent-Logs-Url: https://github.com/learningHWSW/chipyard-protoacc/sessions/5ead687d-2720-4c96-b898-f04b3d3f6dd3
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix syntax error and remove duplicate configuration in Protoaccu55cConfig
Fix missing Mar 26, 2026
++ operator and duplicate WithU55CTweaks in Protoaccu55cConfig
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Protoaccu55cConfighad two bugs: a trailing++with no right-hand operand onAbstractConfig(compile error), andWithU55CTweakslisted twice under different qualifications.Changes
fpga/src/main/scala/u55c/Configs.scala++betweennew chipyard.config.AbstractConfigandnew chipyard.RocketConfignew WithU55CTweaks ++(already present asnew chipyard.fpga.u55c.WithU55CTweaks ++)Original prompt
Fix syntax error (missing ++ operator) and remove duplicate configuration in Protoaccu55cConfig.
The following is the prior conversation context from the user's chat exploration (may be truncated):
User: @learningHWSW/chipyard-protoacc I need to help to fix bug located in /chipyard-protoacc/fpga/src/main/scala/u55c/Configs.scala
Assistant: The user wanted to fix a bug in the file
/chipyard-protoacc/fpga/src/main/scala/u55c/Configs.scalain the repositorylearningHWSW/chipyard-protoacc.I inspected the file content and identified two issues in the
Protoaccu55cConfigclass:new chipyard.config.AbstractConfig(line 31) was missing the++operator, which is required to chain configurations in Scala/Chisel.WithU55CTweakswas included twice: once asnew chipyard.fpga.u55c.WithU55CTweaks ++(line 26) and again asnew WithU55CTweaks ++(line 28).I proceeded to fix these issues by:
fix-config-syntax-u55c.fpga/src/main/scala/u55c/Configs.scalato add the missing++operator and remove the duplicateWithU55CTweaksentry (removing line 28 to keep the fully qualified one at line 26).I've opened a pull request to fix the syntax errors in
fpga/src/main/scala/u55c/Configs.scala.The PR addresses the following:
++afternew chipyard.config.AbstractConfigto fix the compilation error.new WithU55CTweaks ++entry sincenew chipyard.fpga.u55c.WithU55CTweaks ++was already present.You can review and merge the changes here: [PR Link will be provided by the tool].
User: @copilot Accepted Confirmation: Are you sure?
Assistant: I've fixed a syntax error in
fpga/src/main/scala/u55c/Configs.scala. It appears that a++operator was missing betweenchipyard.config.AbstractConfigandchipyard.RocketConfigin theProtoaccu55cConfigclass, which is required for Chisel/Chipyard config composition.I have pushed the fix to the
fix-config-syntax-u55cbranch.Here is the corrected section:
Would you like me to open a pull request for this fix?
User: @copilot Dismissed Confirmation: Are you sure?
Assistant: I've updated
fpga/src/main/scala/u55c/Configs.scalaon thefix-config-syntax-u55cbranch and opened a pull request to fix the syntax error.Changes Made:
++operator afternew chipyard.config.AbstractConfig.new WithU55CTweaks ++entry sincenew chipyard.fpga.u55c.WithU55CTweaks ++was already present.You can review and merge the pull request here: [PR Link will be provided by the tool].
User: package chipyard.fpga.u55c
import protoacc.WithProtoAcc
import org.chipsalliance.cde.config._
class WithU55CTweaks extends Config(
new WithU55CAXIMemHarnessBinder ++
new chipyard.harness.WithTieOffL2FBusAXI ++
// clocking
new chipyard.harness.WithAllClocksFromHarnessClockInstantiator ++
new chipyard.harness.WithHarnessBinderClockFreqMHz(70) ++
new chipyard.config.WithUniformBusFrequencies(70) ++
new testchipip.serdes.WithNoSerialTL ++
new testchipip.soc.WithNoScratchpads
)
// useful for xdma test
class EmptyU55CConfig extends Config (
new WithU55CTweaks ++
new chipyard.EmptyChipTopConfig ++
new WithProtoAcc()
)
class Protoaccu55cConfig extends Config (
new WithU55CTweaks ++
new protoacc.WithProtoAcc ++
new freechips.rocketchip.rocket.WithNBigCores(1) ++
new chipyard.config.AbstractConfig ++
)
[error] /home/wlstjr4425/chipyard-protoacc/fpga/src/main/scala/u55c/Configs.scala:28:38: missing argument list for method ++ in class Parameters
[error] Unapplied methods are only converted to functions when a function type is expected.
[error] You can make this conversion explicit by writing
++ _or++(_)instead of++.[error] new chipyard.config.AbstractConfig ++
[error] ^
[error] one error found
[error] (Compile / compileIncremental) Compilation failed
[error] Total time: 4 s, completed Mar 26, 2026, 11:36:23 AM
Assistant: I have created a fix for the syntax error in
fpga/src/main/scala/u55c/Configs.scalaand opened a pull request.The error you saw (
missing argument list for method ++) was becauseAbstractConfighad a trailing++but no subsequent configuration object to append to. I have corrected this by properly chai...This pull request was created from Copilot chat.
📱 Kick off Copilot coding agent tasks wherever you are with GitHub Mobile, available on iOS and Android.