Skip to content

docs(TEXT scores): add documentation for the new TEXT score type#2769

Merged
wochinge merged 6 commits intomainfrom
tobias/lfe-9040-update-documentation-for-free-form-docs
Apr 10, 2026
Merged

docs(TEXT scores): add documentation for the new TEXT score type#2769
wochinge merged 6 commits intomainfrom
tobias/lfe-9040-update-documentation-for-free-form-docs

Conversation

@wochinge
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@wochinge wochinge commented Apr 2, 2026

Proposed Changes

  • docs: add TEXT score type and centralize score documentation
  • docs: move data-model page to evaluation-methods section because the data model is not tied to experiments at all
  • docs: link scores to concepts page and clarify comments vs text scores

wochinge and others added 3 commits April 2, 2026 11:11
Add documentation for the new TEXT score type across all score-related
pages. Consolidate score concepts (types, use cases, scores vs tags,
comments) into a central Scores section in core-concepts.mdx and slim
down the FAQ to a redirect.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Move data-model.mdx from experiments/ to evaluation-methods/ as the
last nav item. Add redirect for the old path and update all 17
internal references across content, components, and agent config.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown

vercel bot commented Apr 2, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
langfuse-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 7:41am

Request Review

@wochinge wochinge requested a review from Lotte-Verheyden April 2, 2026 09:31
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@Lotte-Verheyden Lotte-Verheyden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking at it now, I think it might be best to have a separate "scores" section, like we have for evaluation methods and experiments? We can put score analytic, data model, and a general scores page under it.

In this version scores section of the core concepts page is too detailed for that page, but the information is still useful. We just need to find a way for people to easily find it. (I think a small scores section on the core concepts page still makes sense, but it can be 1-2 paragraphs linking to a more detailed page for example)

Next to that there's a small bug: if I click "data model", it redirects to LLM-as-a-Judge

--> what do you think?

Move score-related content into a new Scores section under Evaluation
with Overview, Analytics, and Data Model pages. Split the combined
data model page so scores/score configs live under Scores and
datasets/experiments/functions stay under Experiments.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@wochinge wochinge requested a review from Lotte-Verheyden April 8, 2026 09:01
@wochinge
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

wochinge commented Apr 8, 2026

@Lotte-Verheyden Agree on the separate section. I think this just linking there would be hiding the content to much. We already have some pretty cool FAQ pages which are in my opinion a bit too hidden. Hence, favoring the new section.

I did the changes - ready for another review

@wochinge
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

wochinge commented Apr 8, 2026

Should we also move up https://langfuse.com/faq/all/manage-score-configs ? E.g. into Score Configurations or sth? That would in my opinion nicely align with making content more visible

@Lotte-Verheyden
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

I like it now! The concepts page flows well, the score section makes sense there

@dosubot dosubot bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Apr 8, 2026
…e-form-docs

# Conflicts:
#	content/faq/all/what-are-scores.mdx
@wochinge wochinge marked this pull request as ready for review April 10, 2026 07:39
@dosubot dosubot bot added the size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 10, 2026
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@claude review

@wochinge wochinge enabled auto-merge April 10, 2026 07:39
@dosubot dosubot bot added auto-merge This PR is set to be merged documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Apr 10, 2026
@wochinge wochinge added this pull request to the merge queue Apr 10, 2026
Merged via the queue into main with commit 024095c Apr 10, 2026
14 checks passed
@wochinge wochinge deleted the tobias/lfe-9040-update-documentation-for-free-form-docs branch April 10, 2026 07:43
@dosubot dosubot bot removed the auto-merge This PR is set to be merged label Apr 10, 2026
wochinge added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2026
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 10, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer size:XL This PR changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants