Skip to content

feat(sdk): namespace improvements for deepagents#2386

Open
Sydney Runkle (sydney-runkle) wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
sr/namespace-refactor
Open

feat(sdk): namespace improvements for deepagents#2386
Sydney Runkle (sydney-runkle) wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
sr/namespace-refactor

Conversation

@sydney-runkle
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@sydney-runkle Sydney Runkle (sydney-runkle) commented Apr 1, 2026

requires latest LG, will also require docs updates

@github-actions github-actions bot added deepagents Related to the `deepagents` SDK / agent harness feature New feature/enhancement or request for one internal User is a member of the `langchain-ai` GitHub organization size: L 500-999 LOC labels Apr 1, 2026
@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq bot commented Apr 1, 2026

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 32 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 15 skipped benchmarks1


Comparing sr/namespace-refactor (0989f77) with main (06881cc)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 15 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

@mdrxy Mason Daugherty (mdrxy) changed the title feat: namespace improvements for deepagents feat(sdk): namespace improvements for deepagents Apr 1, 2026
"""Context passed to namespace factory functions."""
"""Context passed to namespace factory functions.

.. deprecated::
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wrong syntax

Co-authored-by: Mason Daugherty <mason@langchain.dev>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

deepagents Related to the `deepagents` SDK / agent harness feature New feature/enhancement or request for one internal User is a member of the `langchain-ai` GitHub organization size: L 500-999 LOC

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants