📝 Refactor curate guide

[sunnyosun]

Before	After
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.72%. Comparing base (dcea0f6) to head (ae2b829).
Report is 17 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2957      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   91.89%   89.72%   -2.18%     
==========================================
  Files          73       70       -3     
  Lines       11442     9890    -1552     
==========================================
- Hits        10515     8874    -1641     
- Misses        927     1016      +89     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[github-actions]

Deployment URL: https://350459c1.lamindb.pages.dev

[falexwolf]

I'm sure this is great! Just, it's impossible to see what and why it changed.

Could you write a brief summary of rationales and add Before and After screenshots?

[falexwolf]

Two comments here:

1. I'd not say "messy, real-world data" because the guide is full of synthetic examples. I also don't think we have to stress "messiness" because validation is also for internal data.
2. I think the emojis break style because we don't use them anywhere else. If we want to consistently adopt them, sure, but otherwise I think it's prettier without.
3. The sentences in the enumeration are so long that maybe a period at the end wouldn't hurt now.

[falexwolf]

One could add: "similar to pydantic.Model for dictionaries, and pandera.Schema, and pyarrow.lib.Schema for tables, but supporting more complicated data structures."

[falexwolf]

I'd say:

What Features (dimensions) exist in your dataset

[falexwolf]

I'd say gene-derived features.

[falexwolf]

I think it's great!

Just very few stylistic remarks.