🌱 e2e: use crane to pre-pull images instead of docker pull #13113
Conversation
k8s-ci-robot
added
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
/test help |
|
@chrischdi: The specified target(s) for The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs: Use In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
size/XS
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
cncf-cla: yes
|
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main-gke |
|
Approach makes sense. Not sure on test failures. Related to problems creating some of the node containers? |
|
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main-gke |
k8s-ci-robot
added
size/S
chrischdi
force-pushed
the
pr-test-image-load-workaround
branch
from
e998af3 to
f5e8d70
Compare
|
@chrischdi: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
chrischdi
force-pushed
the
pr-test-image-load-workaround
branch
from
f5e8d70 to
e3c0cc4
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
added
size/M
chrischdi
force-pushed
the
pr-test-image-load-workaround
branch
from
e3c0cc4 to
7cd3838
Compare
k8s-ci-robot
added
size/S
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: a3a835d4c331f1cff41022e9ed2d5795a202be66
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
chrischdi
changed the title
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
k8s-ci-robot
removed
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
/cherry-pick release-1.12 |
|
@fabriziopandini: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@fabriziopandini: new pull request created: #13119 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-1.11 |
|
@fabriziopandini: new pull request created: #13120 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-1.10 |
|
@fabriziopandini: new pull request created: #13121 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
/cherry-pick release-1.10 |
|
@fabriziopandini: new pull request created: #13131 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
chrischdi
changed the title
5 participants
What this PR does / why we need it:
test-infra images were bumped to newer docker versions. Because of that we seem to hit this related kind issue: kubernetes-sigs/kind#3795
NOTE: CAPI has its own implementation and does not directly use kind here.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
/area e2e-testing