📖 Show MHC unhealthyNodeConditions example #12779
Conversation
The migration docs for v1.10 - v1.11 mentions the change to the timeout field but the example doesn't show it. This commit adds it to the example. Signed-off-by: Lennart Jern <[email protected]>
k8s-ci-robot
added
area/documentation
|
Thx! /lgtm /cherry-pick release-1.11 |
|
@sbueringer: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
lgtm
|
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: c142794f6527aec0dd40c6020304b60485515542
|
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
k8s-ci-robot
added
the
approved
|
@sbueringer: new pull request created: #12780 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
4 participants
What this PR does / why we need it:
The migration docs for v1.10 - v1.11 mentions the change to the timeout field but the example doesn't show it. This commit adds it to the example.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes #
/area documentation