Skip to content

Conversation

@kopekC
Copy link
Owner

@kopekC kopekC commented Sep 13, 2023

No description provided.

@kopekC kopekC added the Codegen label Sep 13, 2023
@kopekC kopekC removed the Codegen label Oct 11, 2023
@ed-codegen ed-codegen bot added the Codegen label Oct 11, 2023
@@ -1 +1,7 @@

asdasdasd
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The newly added lines do not seem to contain any meaningful code or comments. It looks like non-descriptive placeholder text or possible error in the code submission. Please, can you replace them with relevant implementation?

asdasdasd


asdasdasd
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lastly, it's essential to keep the code well-structured and in conformity with the existing patterns and practices. The changes in this PR are not following any discernible architecture or coding standards.


asdasdasd

asdasdasdasd
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also observed that no error handling, edge case considerations, or unit test coverage has been added as per the changes visible in the PR. When making additions, always ensure to add proper error handling, cater for potential edge cases and sufficient unit tests for full coverage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants