Skip to content

Conversation

@mangelajo
Copy link
Member

@mangelajo mangelajo commented Nov 3, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added comprehensive Client API docs with practical Python examples demonstrating how to list exporters, request leases, and page results; integrated into the reference navigation.
    • Expanded reference coverage for client configuration and service interactions and added user-facing docstrings for client configuration and lease workflows to clarify usage.

@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Deploy Preview for jumpstarter-docs ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 027acaf
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/jumpstarter-docs/deploys/690913e425a6e40008eeb5fa
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-727--jumpstarter-docs.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 3, 2025

Walkthrough

New documentation pages for the Jumpstarter client API were added and the package API index was updated. Docstrings were added to several public methods in the client configuration module without changing signatures or logic.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Client API docs
docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/index.md, docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/reference.md
New documentation: an index with examples and a reference documenting ClientConfigV1Alpha1 methods for config loading, manipulation, and service interactions (autoclass sections and member lists).
API index update
docs/source/reference/package-apis/index.md
Added Client API entry and toctree reference.
Client module docstrings
packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/client.py
Added or expanded docstrings for public methods (get_exporter, list_exporters, create_lease, delete_lease, list_leases, update_lease, from_file, from_env, dump_yaml) without altering signatures or behavior.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Check docstring accuracy against implementation in packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/client.py.
  • Validate examples and autoclass/member listings in docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/* (imports, example code correctness, toctree links).
  • Confirm no public API signatures were unintentionally changed.

Suggested reviewers

  • bennyz

Poem

🐰 I hopped through docs and left a trace,
New client pages in a tidy place.
Docstrings snug in code so bright,
Leases, exporters — all in sight.
A cheerful nibble, then a happy race. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately summarizes the main change: adding documentation for the client API for Python/gRPC client, which is reflected in all file changes.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch client-api-docs

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@mangelajo mangelajo force-pushed the client-api-docs branch 2 times, most recently from eace7ee to 848e553 Compare November 3, 2025 16:42
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/client.py (3)

165-178: Consider standardizing docstring formatting.

The docstring has inconsistent formatting:

  • Line 168: page_size has * prefix, but not all parameters use it consistently
  • Lines 174-177: The Returns section uses an unconventional .field_name: type format instead of standard docstring conventions

While functional for documentation generation, consider using a consistent style (Google, NumPy, or Sphinx format) throughout the codebase.


220-225: Inconsistent parameter documentation formatting.

Line 222 documents selector without a * prefix, while lines 223-224 use * for duration and begin_time. Consider applying the same formatting to all parameters for consistency.


254-264: Consider standardizing the Returns section format.

Similar to list_exporters, the Returns section uses a non-standard .field_name: type format (lines 262-263). While this may work for documentation generation, standard docstring formats (Google, NumPy, or Sphinx) would improve consistency across the codebase.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca77ec1 and 848e553.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/index.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/reference.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/source/reference/package-apis/index.md (2 hunks)
  • packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/client.py (9 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
  • GitHub Check: Redirect rules - jumpstarter-docs
  • GitHub Check: Header rules - jumpstarter-docs
  • GitHub Check: Pages changed - jumpstarter-docs
  • GitHub Check: build
  • GitHub Check: e2e
  • GitHub Check: pytest-matrix (ubuntu-24.04, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: pytest-matrix (ubuntu-24.04, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: pytest-matrix (ubuntu-24.04, 3.11)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/reference.md (1)

1-22: LGTM!

The API reference structure is well-organized, grouping methods by their purpose (loading, manipulating, and service interaction). All referenced methods exist in the implementation.

docs/source/reference/package-apis/index.md (1)

7-7: LGTM!

The Client API integration follows the existing documentation pattern and is correctly added to both the descriptive list and the toctree.

Also applies to: 17-17

packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/client.py (3)

151-151: LGTM!

Clear and concise docstring.


239-239: LGTM!

These docstrings are clear and concise, providing adequate documentation for the methods.

Also applies to: 334-334, 355-355, 387-387


281-288: LGTM!

The docstring provides clear explanation of the method's purpose and includes good context about extending leases. Parameter formatting is consistent within this docstring.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 848e553 and 027acaf.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/index.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/reference.md (1 hunks)
  • docs/source/reference/package-apis/index.md (2 hunks)
  • packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/client.py (9 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/index.md
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/client.py
  • docs/source/reference/package-apis/index.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (6)
  • GitHub Check: e2e
  • GitHub Check: pytest-matrix (ubuntu-24.04, 3.12)
  • GitHub Check: pytest-matrix (macos-15, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: pytest-matrix (ubuntu-24.04, 3.11)
  • GitHub Check: pytest-matrix (ubuntu-24.04, 3.13)
  • GitHub Check: pytest-matrix (macos-15, 3.12)

Comment on lines +3 to +24
## Loading config files
```{eval-rst}
.. autoclass:: jumpstarter.config.client.ClientConfigV1Alpha1()
:members: from_file, from_env, load, list
:exclude-members: __init__
```

## Manipulating config files
```{eval-rst}
.. autoclass:: jumpstarter.config.client.ClientConfigV1Alpha1()
:no-index:
:members: save, dump_yaml, list, delete
:exclude-members: __init__
```

## Interact with the service
```{eval-rst}
.. autoclass:: jumpstarter.config.client.ClientConfigV1Alpha1()
:no-index:
:members: get_exporter, list_exporters, create_lease, delete_lease, lease, list_leases, update_lease
:exclude-members: __init__
```
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

Verify that all documented methods exist and have proper docstrings in the source file.

The documentation references 14 methods across three sections. Per the AI summary, docstrings were added to methods in packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/client.py, but I need to verify that all referenced methods exist and are properly documented.

Additionally, the list method appears in both section 1 (line 6) and section 2 (line 14). Please clarify if this is intentional (a shared utility method used in both loading and manipulating contexts) or if it should only appear in one section.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all methods referenced in the documentation exist in ClientConfigV1Alpha1
# and have docstrings (non-empty __doc__ attributes).

# Find the client config file
config_file=$(fd -t f "client\.py" packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/ 2>/dev/null | head -1)

if [ -z "$config_file" ]; then
  echo "Error: Could not find client.py in packages/jumpstarter/jumpstarter/config/"
  exit 1
fi

echo "Checking file: $config_file"
echo ""

# List of methods to verify
methods=(
  "from_file" "from_env" "load" "list"
  "save" "dump_yaml" "delete"
  "get_exporter" "list_exporters" "create_lease" "delete_lease" "lease" "list_leases" "update_lease"
)

# Search for class definition and each method
echo "Verifying ClientConfigV1Alpha1 class and methods:"
rg -A 300 "class ClientConfigV1Alpha1" "$config_file" | head -400

Length of output: 11944


Remove the non-existent delete method from the documentation.

The delete method referenced in section 2 ("Manipulating config files", line 14) does not exist in the ClientConfigV1Alpha1 class. All other documented methods exist with proper docstrings. Remove delete from the :members: list in the second autoclass directive.

The list method appearing in both section 1 and section 2 is valid—it applies to both loading and manipulating workflows.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In docs/source/reference/package-apis/client/reference.md around lines 3 to 24,
the second autoclass block under "Manipulating config files" incorrectly lists a
non-existent method `delete`; remove `delete` from the `:members:` list in that
second block so it reads only `save, dump_yaml, list` (preserving the existing
`:no-index:` and `:exclude-members:` lines).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants