Skip to content

Gui tests#216

Open
ludivintchokote wants to merge 8 commits into
juami:mainfrom
ludivintchokote:gui-tests
Open

Gui tests#216
ludivintchokote wants to merge 8 commits into
juami:mainfrom
ludivintchokote:gui-tests

Conversation

@ludivintchokote

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Closes #191

@sbillinge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for doing this @ludivintchokote, this is great!

I hate to say it, but this PR seems to have not been created from a clean properly sync'ed main.

Also, this is a pretty big job. I suggest that we maybe break it down into small PRs and get the merged separately to make the code review a bit easier.

Also, none of your tests are passing. Are you running them locally to test before making the PR?

@ludivintchokote

ludivintchokote commented Jan 29, 2025 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@ludivintchokote

ludivintchokote commented Jan 29, 2025 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@sbillinge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Oh! What should I do each time I'm creating a new branch from the main branch? When creating it tells me it's synced with the main. Perhaps there's something I'm not getting right On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, 18:01 Ludivin Tchokote @.> wrote:

Yeah to test first put the test file in the code folder and run the test. Locally that's what I did. To test it directly from the test file raised import issues. I'm trying to figure a way to fix the import error I'm receiving On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, 13:41 Simon Billinge @.
> wrote: > Thanks for doing this @ludivintchokote > https://github.com/ludivintchokote, this is great! > > I hate to say it, but this PR seems to have not been created from a clean > properly sync'ed main. > > Also, this is a pretty big job. I suggest that we maybe break it down > into small PRs and get the merged separately to make the code review a bit > easier. > > Also, none of your tests are passing. Are you running them locally to > test before making the PR? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#216 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BNJCXPEX2K24PA6KYQAG7RD2NDD6RAVCNFSM6AAAAABWBCLNTSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMRRGUZTGNJZGM > . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > @.***> >

Let's test your setup. Please could you type "git remote -v" and then "git checkout main" and then "git pull upstream main" and paste a screenshot of what your terminal looks like without losing anything.

@ludivintchokote

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Please find the output below

Oh! What should I do each time I'm creating a new branch from the main branch? When creating it tells me it's synced with the main. Perhaps there's something I'm not getting right On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, 18:01 Ludivin Tchokote @.> wrote:

Yeah to test first put the test file in the code folder and run the test. Locally that's what I did. To test it directly from the test file raised import issues. I'm trying to figure a way to fix the import error I'm receiving On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, 13:41 Simon Billinge _
@**
._> wrote: > Thanks for doing this @ludivintchokote > https://github.com/ludivintchokote, this is great! > > I hate to say it, but this PR seems to have not been created from a clean > properly sync'ed main. > > Also, this is a pretty big job. I suggest that we maybe break it down > into small PRs and get the merged separately to make the code review a bit > easier. > > Also, none of your tests are passing. Are you running them locally to > test before making the PR? > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <#216 (comment)>, > or unsubscribe > https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BNJCXPEX2K24PA6KYQAG7RD2NDD6RAVCNFSM6AAAAABWBCLNTSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMRRGUZTGNJZGM > . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > _@_.*> >

Let's test your setup. Please could you type "git remote -v" and then "git checkout main" and then "git pull upstream main" and paste a screenshot of what your terminal looks like without losing anything.

Here's the output
image

@sbillinge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@ludivintchokote ok, great everything seems to be correctly connected. Please can you now type git log. Let's see if there are any accidental commits to your local main.....

@sbillinge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

this is what my main looks like:
image

@ludivintchokote

ludivintchokote commented Jan 29, 2025 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@sbillinge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Here's the output of the git log

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025, 20:35 Simon Billinge @.> wrote: @ludivintchokote https://github.com/ludivintchokote ok, great everything seems to be correctly connected. Please can you now type git log. Let's see if there are any accidental commits to your local main..... — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#216 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BNJCXPHLMLK46J3BP52BF3L2NEUQBAVCNFSM6AAAAABWBCLNTSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDMMRSGY3DINRRGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.>

thanks @ludivintchokote but I don't see the output....

@ludivintchokote

ludivintchokote commented Jan 29, 2025 via email

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

@sbillinge

sbillinge commented Jan 29, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

this is what I see when I click on that image link, I don't see the git log....:
image

@ludivintchokote

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

Sorry here is the output
image

@ludivintchokote

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

image

@sbillinge

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

ok @ludivintchokote everything looks ok. Please can you try and make a new branch off of main and do some edits and make a PR and let's see if it clean or has extra commits for some reason.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

fix: Figure out a way to run some GUI unit tests

3 participants