Skip to content

style-guide: say that we prefer lower-level tests over e2e test #7283

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 19, 2025

Conversation

martinvonz
Copy link
Member

Checklist

If applicable:

  • I have updated CHANGELOG.md
  • I have updated the documentation (README.md, docs/, demos/)
  • I have updated the config schema (cli/src/config-schema.json)
  • I have added/updated tests to cover my changes

End-to-end tests using the `jj` binary are often easy and natural to
write, but it's easy to miss how much slower they are than `jj-lib`
tests.
@martinvonz martinvonz requested a review from a team as a code owner August 18, 2025 06:13
@martinvonz martinvonz added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 19, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit e8f9169 Aug 19, 2025
28 checks passed
@martinvonz martinvonz deleted the mz/vsukoqvrynyk branch August 19, 2025 06:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants