add plugin 'governance/rlBlock'

[rl-maartenb]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[github-actions]

CLA Assistant Lite bot All contributors have signed the CLA ✍️ ✅

[rl-maartenb]

sorry but neither I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA nor recheck actually work as comment it seems

…

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 2:58 PM Neha Mishra ***@***.***> wrote: recheck — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#488 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A7K4CAVFWQYTZZFW3VWU4BL2WP7YTAVCNFSM6AAAAABZXMR6RGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDONJYGE2TQOBVGU> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***> [image: nehamjfrog]*nehamjfrog* left a comment (jfrog/artifactory-user-plugins#488) <#488 (comment)> recheck — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#488 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A7K4CAVFWQYTZZFW3VWU4BL2WP7YTAVCNFSM6AAAAABZXMR6RGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDONJYGE2TQOBVGU> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Maarten Boot Principal Engineer ReversingLabs d.o.o. Zagreb, Croatia, Europe TimeZone: CET / CEST

[nehamjfrog]

can you please ask the committer to sign the CLA, I see that rl-devops is the committer in the PR.

[rl-devops]

I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA

[rl-maartenb]

my own confusion, thanks for the assistance, all is perfect again.

…

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 3:09 PM Neha Mishra ***@***.***> wrote: can you please ask the committer to sign the CLA, I see that rl-devops is the committer in the PR. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#488 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A7K4CAULMNMZK3APRMMDBC32WQBCRAVCNFSM6AAAAABZXMR6RGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDONJYGE4TOMZXGM> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***> [image: nehamjfrog]*nehamjfrog* left a comment (jfrog/artifactory-user-plugins#488) <#488 (comment)> can you please ask the committer to sign the CLA, I see that rl-devops is the committer in the PR. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#488 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/A7K4CAULMNMZK3APRMMDBC32WQBCRAVCNFSM6AAAAABZXMR6RGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDONJYGE4TOMZXGM> . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

-- Maarten Boot Principal Engineer ReversingLabs d.o.o. Zagreb, Croatia, Europe TimeZone: CET / CEST

[rl-maartenb]

any progress when we can expect feedback for acceptance ?

[rl-maartenb]

no living humans anymore to respond ?

[nehamjfrog]

Thank you for your contribution to the jfrog/artifactory-user-plugins repository — we truly appreciate the effort and your interest in enhancements.

As part of our ongoing evolution, we're transitioning towards JFrog Workers as the preferred approach for extending Artifactory's capabilities. You can learn more about this direction here

We kindly ask if you're interested, consider contributing to our new repository instead

Thanks again for your support and for being part of the community!

[rl-maartenb]

Respectfully, we would like to urge you to reconsider and support the plugin.

Workers only are supported by the licences types: Enterprise X and Enterprise+, see:

• https://jfrog.com/help/r/jfrog-platform-administration-documentation/workers:
  "From Artifactory 7.94 the Workers service is supported with Enterprise X and Enterprise+ licenses."

We would support the plugin where-ever plugins work (so that includes the Pro licence that we ourselves also use).

We would not intend to force any customer to increase the cost or complexity of their infrastructure
just because they would want to use our plugin functionality.

Neither would we want to push them into a cloud solution or complicate their setup with a kubernetes hosted instance, just to support workers, when a local hosted Artifactory instance performs just fine for them.