Skip to content

Conversation

@TheRealRyGuy
Copy link
Contributor

isn't required, so still can hold original functionality of passing null here
adds #179

Copy link

@milroneth milroneth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Handles null values correctly, no issues, only much needed functionality

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants