fs-api: tighten the package bound on Win32

[geo2a]

No description provided.

[jorisdral]

Personally, I've never tried to tighten these bounds because I don't have a Windows machine that I could test different bounds on 😛 In lsm-tree, we also support only 2.14, so I see no problems here

BTW, there are some CI jobs that are not listed are required. I think it's the jobs that were added back in #103

[geo2a]

We've discovered that we are missing the upper bound when @jasagredo tried to upload a package candidate to Hackage. I've just copy-pasted the bounds from lsm-tree 🧠

BTW, there are some CI jobs that are not listed are required.

I've indeed forgotten to make some of them required again, thanks @jorisdral!

[jorisdral]

We've discovered that we are missing the upper bound when @jasagredo tried to upload a package candidate to Hackage. I've just copy-pasted the bounds from lsm-tree 🧠

Ah, yes, I think Hackage only recently started complaining about missing upper bounds for new package uploads