Skip to content

Conversation

@adriendupuis
Copy link
Contributor

Question Answer
Tickets IBX-6338
Bug fix? yes
New feature? no
BC breaks? no
Tests pass? yes/no
Doc needed? no
License GPL-2.0

Following #25, I disagree with the systematic addition of this Content ID sort clause for two distinct reasons:

  • In Elasticsearch, max_score is calculated only if _score is the only sort clause. The addition of this sort clause disable max_score, preventing to extend the search with displaying a relevance ratio score/max_score.
  • Because of this addition, SortClause/Random can't be added as a SortingDefinition. "As a reviewer, I want to shuffle the results to pick one randomly for review".

Checklist:

  • Implement tests
  • Coding standards ($ composer fix-cs)

@adriendupuis adriendupuis requested a review from kisztof November 17, 2023 13:28
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@adriendupuis adriendupuis changed the title IBX-6338: SearchQueryType.php: Do not add SortClause\ContentId if there is already sort clauses IBX-6338: Do not add SortClause\ContentId if there is already sort clauses Nov 17, 2023
@adriendupuis adriendupuis changed the title IBX-6338: Do not add SortClause\ContentId if there is already sort clauses IBX-6338: Do not add SortClause\ContentId if there is sort clauses Nov 17, 2023
Copy link
Member

@adamwojs adamwojs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Arguments seems to be valid, however I believe we should add we ContentId sort clause for relevant Sorting Definitions

@konradoboza
Copy link
Contributor

@adriendupuis could you please address @adamwojs remark?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants