Skip to content

Support cluster shrinking #100

Description

@jcharum

For workloads that intersperse Bigslice computations with other long-running computations, there could be significant cost savings by shrinking or eliminating worker machines in between the Bigslice computations.

It's possible to workaround this today by spawning different Bigslice computations, but that is clunky. You have to deal with spawning processes and possibly serializing results.

This may be made much simpler depending on an implementation of #99. If use of a backing store were a prerequisite for shrinking, we could shut down machines with impunity.

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    enhancementNew feature or request

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions