Skip to content

Update SizeEq safety invariant #2564

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 4, 2025

Conversation

joshlf
Copy link
Member

@joshlf joshlf commented Jun 4, 2025

This should have been changed in #2428, where we changed the in-practice
safety invariant, but forgot to update the doc comment.

Makes progress on #1817


This PR is on branch transmute-ref-dst.

This should have been changed in #2428, where we changed the in-practice
safety invariant, but forgot to update the doc comment.

Makes progress on #1817

gherrit-pr-id: I910c77e45532313e316ee443f9cf70d0d74cff67
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.85%. Comparing base (09334fd) to head (feb5e1f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2564   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   88.85%   88.85%           
=======================================
  Files          20       20           
  Lines        5312     5312           
=======================================
  Hits         4720     4720           
  Misses        592      592           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@joshlf joshlf added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 4, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 81a0fd9 Jun 4, 2025
89 checks passed
@joshlf joshlf deleted the I910c77e45532313e316ee443f9cf70d0d74cff67 branch June 4, 2025 16:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants