Skip to content

Conversation

sadiqkhoja
Copy link
Contributor

@sadiqkhoja sadiqkhoja commented Sep 5, 2025

Part of getodk/central#1185

What has been done to verify that this works as intended?

Added couple of tests.

Why is this the best possible solution? Were any other approaches considered?

Uses existing approach.

How does this change affect users? Describe intentional changes to behavior and behavior that could have accidentally been affected by code changes. In other words, what are the regression risks?

None

Does this change require updates to the API documentation? If so, please update docs/api.yaml as part of this PR.

Updated.

Before submitting this PR, please make sure you have:

  • run make test and confirmed all checks still pass OR confirm CircleCI build passes
  • verified that any code from external sources are properly credited in comments or that everything is internally sourced

@sadiqkhoja sadiqkhoja force-pushed the fixes/1185-search-entity-csv branch from ea0b8f3 to 6081e49 Compare September 5, 2025 16:17
@sadiqkhoja sadiqkhoja force-pushed the fixes/1185-search-entity-csv branch from 6081e49 to c93620b Compare September 5, 2025 16:48
@sadiqkhoja sadiqkhoja marked this pull request as ready for review September 5, 2025 17:51
@sadiqkhoja sadiqkhoja requested a review from ktuite September 5, 2025 17:51
Copy link
Member

@matthew-white matthew-white left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I reviewed the Frontend part of this (getodk/central-frontend#1336), so I thought I'd quickly review the Backend as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants