Skip to content

Conversation

@linahanner
Copy link
Contributor

@linahanner linahanner commented Jul 21, 2019

Concerns issue #12

Feels like a very robust technical solution. Have not had the time to look into prose as of yet and therefore want to leave it in a separate branch, to see if I can further develop the proof of concept

Edit: Since Jekyll has built-in support for Sass, I decided to move away from the previous Less solution to reduce the number of dependencies. The source code infrastructure looks a lot more elegant with these changes in place. Install Ruby and the gem bundler in order to install jekyll.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant