docs: development: ingest-records-manually: fix backtick typo

[Xata]

On the Ingest records manually page, the line with flb_lib_push() is rendering as flb_lib_push()`:

This fixes the backtick placement so it should render correctly now.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Corrected API function name reference in development documentation to ensure accurate guidance.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation correction: Fixed function name reference in development documentation from flb_lib_push() to flb_lib_push(). Single-file textual correction with no behavioral or control-flow changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
Documentation correction development/ingest-records-manually.md	Fixed function name reference from incorrect flb_lib_push() to correct flb_lib_push() format

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~1 minute

Poem

🐰 An underscore misplaced, now set free,
The docs shine brighter, as they should be,
Small fixes matter, in clarity's dance,
A typo corrected—code's second glance! ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately describes the main change: fixing a backtick typo in the documentation that corrects how the function name renders.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d261f6a and 0851c14.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• development/ingest-records-manually.md (1 hunks)

🧰 Additional context used

🪛 LanguageTool

development/ingest-records-manually.md

[style] ~5-~5: ‘in conjunction with’ might be wordy. Consider a shorter alternative.
Context: ...n called lib exists and can be used in conjunction with the flb_lib_push() API function. ## ...

(EN_WORDINESS_PREMIUM_IN_CONJUNCTION_WITH)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

development/ingest-records-manually.md (1)

5-5: Backtick placement fix looks good.

The corrected backtick placement for flb_lib_push() now renders correctly and aligns with the function usage examples on lines 66–67. The documentation reference is consistent throughout.

As a minor note: the static analysis tool flagged "in conjunction with" as potentially wordy. Consider a shorter phrasing like "used with" if you'd like to further streamline the language—entirely optional.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[eschabell]

Thanks @Xata for the fix!