-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 167
Support MatIS and BDDC #4405
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pbrubeck
wants to merge
42
commits into
release
Choose a base branch
from
pbrubeck/matis
base: release
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Support MatIS and BDDC #4405
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
42 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4d45c97
Support mat_type="is"
pbrubeck da194e3
MatIS: support DirichletBC, add a test
pbrubeck 2c66987
MatIS: Fix parallel LGMap
pbrubeck 8aba5ca
MatNest + MatIS
pbrubeck 6c74a50
More comprehensive tests
pbrubeck 19d8448
Propagate sub_mat_type, fix MatNest + MatIS
pbrubeck 1ae4509
Only set sub_mat_type on the diagonal blocks
pbrubeck 595ba4e
style
pbrubeck 31fd70e
Test BDDC, setCoordinates
pbrubeck 43047c2
Fix VectorFunctionSpace
pbrubeck 112ad6b
refine BDDC customization
stefanozampini 6ba8db8
fix lint
stefanozampini a9a404b
match slepc4py version with petsc4py
stefanozampini e24aec1
Merge release
pbrubeck 7441a98
Simplify coordinates handling of bddcpc driver
stefanozampini d32c6bd
Merge branch 'pbrubeck/matis' of github.com:firedrakeproject/firedrak…
stefanozampini b3a7dcc
FDM: fix block size
stefanozampini 8b1a6ff
Don't know why this fixes the mapping for me
stefanozampini a13a25e
test tabulate_exterior_derivative
pbrubeck 3117e2a
add failing test
stefanozampini 172419d
Fix vertex dofs
pbrubeck 45ac409
Add permutation test
pbrubeck 28f8574
Trivial case for get_restriction_indices
pbrubeck 89a7863
DROP BEFORE MERGE
pbrubeck a60eb7a
mark parellel test
pbrubeck b47afd3
bddc: use callables for gradient and divergence
stefanozampini dbd1a88
minor
stefanozampini 27b4e5c
remove unrelated test
pbrubeck ef0e593
Merge branch 'release' into pbrubeck/matis
pbrubeck b9c6180
tabulate_exterior_derivative as MatIS
pbrubeck 98b9103
Fix tabulate_exterior_derivative in parallel
pbrubeck 6e30284
BDDC get_divergence_mat
pbrubeck 68fb7aa
Fix high-order divergence tabulation
pbrubeck 65b636f
Merge branch 'release' into pbrubeck/matis
pbrubeck 81e8d34
Cleanup
pbrubeck c715954
cleanup
pbrubeck bde359d
Fix Q1
pbrubeck e062b43
Test tabulate_exterior_derivative
pbrubeck 6b7d89e
H(curl) constraints for BDDC
pbrubeck eff7515
cleanup
pbrubeck 34cbf0f
Refactor
pbrubeck e245bf8
FDMPC: Support other variants
pbrubeck File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ksagiyam is it possible to get a
RestrictedFunctionSpace
with the unghostedFunctionSpace
(the space that corresponds toDistributedMeshOverlapType.None
)?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alternatively, if I reconstruct the FunctionSpace with the mesh without the overlap, would I get consistent dof orderings? How do I recover the mesh without overlap?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can make a
RestrictedFunctionSpace
withboundary_set=ghost entities
.DoF ordering on each entity is the same only for CG and DG spaces (assuming that cone orderings are preserved). Otherwise DoFs depend on the global vertex numbers, which are arbitrary.
I think what we want is to be able to pass
ignore_halos=True
toop2.Sparsity
and haveop2.DataSet.lgmap
(and similar) return the correct lgmap in the first place depending on the value ofignore_halos
?