Issue 69 - remote signing via extension#70
Conversation
|
I think this confuses the role of this extension and complicates the code unnecessarily. The functionality is good and laudable and I may even prefer to use that myself over nos2x as it is today, but I think it would be better packaged as a different extension. |
|
Thanks for reviewing the code. The feature is also useful to manage a shared account, i.e. a company account where multiple people have permission to publish on behalf of the company (but not forever). |
|
I wish you would publish it yourself because this is so annoying, all the bureaucracy and whatnot. Let me think about it. |
e33d985 to
36d3dff
Compare
The extension's private-key is not used directly to sign/encrypt/decrypt, but to communicate with an nsec bunker (i.e. nsec.app ).
The website doesn't even know that a bunker is used! it just sends sign/encrypt/decrypt requests to the extension.
Closes #69
I'm not sure if I implemented
getRelayscorrectly - should I get the local extension relays or the remote ones?Tested with Coracle and https://nsec.app (nsec.app has unrelated bugs when it comes to additional permission requests)