Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Make the direct
llms.txtfetch path honor FetchKit's configured body-size cap and truncation semantics.Closes #95.
Why
The direct
llms.txtbranch inDocsSiteFetcherread the full response body with.text().await, so it ignoredmax_body_size, returned oversized payloads intact, and skipped the usual truncation signal.How
llms.txtresponsesmax_body_size, defaulting to the shared 10 MiB cap when unsetllms.txtrequests truncate and reporttruncated: truewhen the cap is exceededRisk
llms.txtresponses now surfacesizeand truncation metadata consistent with the default fetcher; the main regression risk is around callers that assumed uncapped bodies on this specialized pathChecklist