feat(tests): eip7928 checklist v1

[fselmo]

🗒️ Description

These are the last remaining tests that I believe get us to a really good spot for the testing checklist for EIP-7928 (BALs).

As mentioned in the testing calls, I think there are some very real missing gaps that the current version of the checklist doesn't cover for complex EIPs that now have different behavior at different opcode gas boundaries, etc. As we discussed, this will likely be on some V2 of the checklist and I'm already working on a version of this with EIP-7928 and some of EIP-8037 as good candidates for what surface areas to expand upon.

✅ Checklist

• All: Ran fast static checks to avoid unnecessary CI fails, see also Code Standards and Enabling Pre-commit Checks:

  just static

• All: PR title adheres to the repo standard - it will be used as the squash commit message and should start type(scope):.
• All: Considered updating the online docs in the ./docs/ directory.
• All: Set appropriate labels for the changes (only maintainers can apply labels).
• Tests: Ran mkdocs serve locally and verified the auto-generated docs for new tests in the Test Case Reference are correctly formatted.

Cute Animal Picture

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 87.14%. Comparing base (b3f5df5) to head (592bd58).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on forks/amsterdam.

Additional details and impacted files

@@                 Coverage Diff                 @@
##           forks/amsterdam    #2859      +/-   ##
===================================================
+ Coverage            86.94%   87.14%   +0.20%     
===================================================
  Files                  586      586              
  Lines                35777    35792      +15     
  Branches              3363     3364       +1     
===================================================
+ Hits                 31106    31192      +86     
+ Misses                4012     3950      -62     
+ Partials               659      650       -9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	87.14% <ø> (+0.20%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[marioevz]

Looks great overall. I've flagged two issues with the fork transition tests. It might be an issue with our framework.

[marioevz]

LGTM, thanks for making the changes 👍