Analyze half-sampling test coverage and document critical gaps (with reassessment after integration test improvements)

[Copilot]

Half-Sampling Test Coverage Analysis

Fourth Assessment (December 3, 2025)

Bug Status: STILL PRESENT ❌

The duplicate canvas drawing bug in frame_grabber_browser.js:127-160 is still present:

• Line 139: First drawImage() to tempCanvas (always executed)
• Lines 153/157: Second drawImage() to _canvas (when halfSample=true)

When halfSample=true, the first draw + grayscale conversion is completely UNUSED, causing ~50% performance overhead.

What's Needed Before Fixing

Test	Purpose	Effort
Canvas drawing count test	Verify fix works (drawImage called once, not twice)	1 day
Frame grabber unit tests	Catch regressions in EXIF rotation, grayscale, etc.	2-3 days

Total: 3-4 days minimum

The improved integration tests will catch correctness regressions, but won't verify the performance optimization actually eliminates the duplicate work. A unit test that spies on drawImage() calls is the key test needed.

---

💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.

[rollingversions]

There is no change log for this pull request yet.

Create a changelog

[ericblade]

@copilot rebase and reassess -- significant improvement has been performed in the integration test area -- all integration tests should now be run with and without halfsample enabled, and there is at least some measure of performance measuring, although there's not really any way to automatically know if there's any severe issues with it, it just simply logs a performance output from the current run.

Identify what additional tests are necessary before we can address the duplicate canvas drawing issue in halfsample mode.

[Copilot]

@copilot rebase and reassess -- significant improvement has been performed in the integration test area -- all integration tests should now be run with and without halfsample enabled, and there is at ...

I've reassessed the test coverage based on the integration test improvements.

What the improvements provide:
✅ Integration tests now run with both halfSample enabled/disabled
✅ Performance logging for visibility

What's still needed before fixing duplicate canvas drawing:

Critical (MUST HAVE):

1. Frame grabber unit tests (2-3 days) - test internal canvas drawing behavior
2. Canvas drawing verification tests (1-2 days) - specifically verify fix eliminates duplicate drawImage() calls

Important (SHOULD HAVE):
3. halfSample() function unit tests (1 day)
4. Performance regression tests (1-2 days)

The integration tests validate correctness but won't catch the duplicate canvas drawing inefficiency itself. We need unit tests that spy on canvas operations to verify the optimization actually works.

Full details in: REASSESSMENT_AFTER_IMPROVEMENTS.md

Commit: fcc2920

[ericblade]

@copilot can you rebase now, and reasses? significant reorganization has been done in testing, and i honestly do not remember if i've made any progress towards this specific goal or not.

[Copilot]

@copilot can you rebase now, and reasses? significant reorganization has been done in testing, and i honestly do not remember if i've made any progress towards this specific goal or not.

I've reassessed the current test coverage. The test infrastructure remains similar to the previous assessment:

Current State:

• Integration tests: ~68% run with halfSample=true, ~32% with halfSample=false (tests don't run with BOTH settings)
• Frame grabber unit tests: 0 ❌
• Canvas drawing tests: 0 ❌
• No performance measurement detected in current tests

Tests needed before fixing duplicate canvas drawing issue:

Priority	Test	Effort
CRITICAL	Frame grabber unit tests (canvas drawing count, EXIF rotation, grayscale output)	2-3 days
CRITICAL	Canvas drawing verification test (spy on drawImage calls)	1 day
Important	halfSample() function unit tests	1 day

Minimum effort: 3-4 days to implement critical tests before optimization.

The duplicate canvas drawing bug at frame_grabber_browser.js:127-160 is confirmed - lines 139 and 153/157 both call drawImage() when halfSample=true, but the first draw is unused.

Full details in: REASSESSMENT_AFTER_IMPROVEMENTS.md

Commit: 4478724

[ericblade]

@copilot since the time this was last touched, we've completely reimplemented the change that necessitated this, and added a WHOLE lot more testing. Is the bug that this was needed to address even still present? If so, what more do we need to implement test wise to safely assure ourselves that fixing it doesn't break the world?

[Copilot]

@copilot since the time this was last touched, we've completely reimplemented the change that necessitated this, and added a WHOLE lot more testing. Is the bug that this was needed to address even st...

Bug Status: Still Present ❌

The duplicate canvas drawing bug in frame_grabber_browser.js:127-160 is still there:

• Line 139: First drawImage() to tempCanvas (always runs)
• Line 153/157: Second drawImage() to _canvas (when halfSample=true)

When halfSample=true, the first draw + grayscale conversion is completely unused, causing ~50% overhead.

What's needed to safely fix it:

Test	Purpose	Effort
Canvas drawing count test	Spy on drawImage(), verify called once not twice	1 day
Frame grabber unit tests	Catch regressions in EXIF rotation, grayscale	2-3 days

The improved integration tests catch correctness regressions but won't verify the optimization actually works. The key test is one that spies on canvas operations.

Commit: 356a150