Skip to content

Update ex_ice #225

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2025
Merged

Update ex_ice #225

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2025

Conversation

Karolk99
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@Karolk99 Karolk99 requested a review from mickel8 July 10, 2025 11:43
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.79%. Comparing base (e339453) to head (9447b8d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #225      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   87.86%   87.79%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          54       54              
  Lines        2752     2752              
==========================================
- Hits         2418     2416       -2     
- Misses        334      336       +2     

see 1 file with indirect coverage changes


Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e339453...9447b8d. Read the comment docs.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Karolk99 Karolk99 merged commit 38e05e2 into master Jul 10, 2025
3 checks passed
@Karolk99 Karolk99 deleted the update-ex-ice branch July 10, 2025 11:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants