Skip to content

bk: use latest FIPS VM images and stop using catalog-info step but GH actions validation #5145

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

v1v
Copy link
Member

@v1v v1v commented Jul 11, 2025

What is the problem this PR solves?

How does this PR solve the problem?

Run faster rather than always and delegate the responsibility to the existing tooling.
Align the same VM image strategy regardless of FIPS or non-fips.

How to test this PR locally

Design Checklist

  • I have ensured my design is stateless and will work when multiple fleet-server instances are behind a load balancer.
  • I have or intend to scale test my changes, ensuring it will work reliably with 100K+ agents connected.
  • I have included fail safe mechanisms to limit the load on fleet-server: rate limiting, circuit breakers, caching, load shedding, etc.

Checklist

  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • I have made corresponding change to the default configuration files
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • I have added an entry in ./changelog/fragments using the changelog tool

Related issues

remove cataog-info step and rely on the GH actions
@v1v v1v self-assigned this Jul 11, 2025
@v1v v1v requested a review from a team as a code owner July 11, 2025 08:10
@v1v v1v requested review from blakerouse and pkoutsovasilis July 11, 2025 08:10
@v1v v1v added backport-9.0 Automated backport to the 9.0 branch backport-8.19 Automated backport to the 8.19 branch backport-9.1 Automated backport to the 9.1 branch labels Jul 11, 2025
@prodsecmachine
Copy link

prodsecmachine commented Jul 11, 2025

🎉 Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

security/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

license/snyk check is complete. No issues have been found. (View Details)

@pierrehilbert pierrehilbert added the Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane Label for the Agent Control Plane team label Jul 11, 2025
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-8.19 Automated backport to the 8.19 branch backport-9.0 Automated backport to the 9.0 branch backport-9.1 Automated backport to the 9.1 branch Team:Elastic-Agent-Control-Plane Label for the Agent Control Plane team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants