Skip to content

chore (ci): Use Svace base image #1145

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025
Merged

chore (ci): Use Svace base image #1145

merged 4 commits into from
Jun 16, 2025

Conversation

himax1991
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Use Svace base image instead of building own.

Why do we need it, and what problem does it solve?

This approach brings unification and relieves from unnecessary additional builds and simplifies svace image maintenance.

What is the expected result?

The same svace build as it was, but without extra build steps and variables initializations.

Checklist

  • The code is covered by unit tests.
  • e2e tests passed.
  • Documentation updated according to the changes.
  • Changes were tested in the Kubernetes cluster manually.

Changelog entries

section: ci
type: chore
summary: Use Svace base image

Signed-off-by: Maksim Khimchenko <[email protected]>
@himax1991 himax1991 added the analyze/svace Run build and Svace analyze label Jun 9, 2025
himax1991 added 2 commits June 9, 2025 17:36
Signed-off-by: Maksim Khimchenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Maksim Khimchenko <[email protected]>
@nevermarine nevermarine added this to the v0.20.0 milestone Jun 10, 2025
@himax1991 himax1991 marked this pull request as ready for review June 10, 2025 08:46
@himax1991 himax1991 merged commit e261b5c into main Jun 16, 2025
23 of 24 checks passed
@himax1991 himax1991 deleted the svace-base-images branch June 16, 2025 08:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
analyze/svace Run build and Svace analyze
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants