Skip to content

non normative language around revocation policies. #301

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: ask/update_links
Choose a base branch
from
Open

non normative language around revocation policies. #301

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@andorsk
Copy link
Collaborator

@andorsk andorsk commented May 15, 2024

Addresses #138. To discuss over next call.

@andorsk andorsk changed the title ask/update_revocation non normative language around revocation policies. May 15, 2024
@andorsk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

andorsk commented May 15, 2024

add in additional language in the companion guide to add further information or reference the original issue.

@andorsk andorsk added the stage: needs review needs review label Sep 4, 2024
@andorsk andorsk marked this pull request as ready for review September 4, 2024 14:40
@andorsk
Copy link
Collaborator Author

andorsk commented Sep 4, 2024 •
edited
Loading

  • decision : revocation is explicit or implicit permission.
  • Liran : Reference implementation does not do chained delegation.
  • Revoking direct delegations only doesn't cover common enterprise case
  • Make revocation an explicit permission. UCAN adopted.
  • Is it a v0.0.1 or v0.0.2 problem.
  • Breaking change.

TODO: add more examples, speak specifically to construct to the spec.

@andorsk andorsk requested a review from LiranCohen September 4, 2024 16:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@LiranCohen LiranCohen Awaiting requested review from LiranCohen

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

stage: needs review needs review

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@andorsk