Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: Replace df.iterrows() with df.to_dict('records')#85

Open
alinelena wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-df-iterrows-9059888790682986603
Open

⚡ Bolt: Replace df.iterrows() with df.to_dict('records')#85
alinelena wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-df-iterrows-9059888790682986603

Conversation

@alinelena

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What

Replaced slow df.iterrows() calls in verify_processed_omol25.py and test_process_omol25.py with df.to_dict('records') conversions prior to executing list comprehensions.

🎯 Why

Iterating through a DataFrame via df.iterrows() wraps every single row iteration in a Pandas Series object. This repeated object allocation overhead causes dramatic slow downs in processing loops, especially on larger datasets. Converting to a list of standard dictionaries is far more efficient and avoids this bottleneck entirely.

📊 Impact

Significant reduction in processing time when loading data (specifically during DataFrame indexing), avoiding the expensive instantiation of numerous Pandas Series. Functionality and data integrity are perfectly maintained.

🔬 Measurement

Run python -m pytest on non-MPI tests to verify existing validations pass correctly. Run the verify_processed_omol25.py script on a large Parquet/ExtXYZ dataset and time its execution to notice a measurable speedup.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 9059888790682986603 started by @alinelena

Converted Pandas DataFrame rows directly to a list of native Python dictionaries before list comprehension loops in `verify_processed_omol25.py` and `test_process_omol25.py`. This avoids the significant overhead caused by Pandas allocating and building `Series` objects for every row during `.iterrows()` calls. Tests pass and functionality remains perfectly equivalent since dicts share the exact same bracket notation syntax.

Co-authored-by: alinelena <3306823+alinelena@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant