Skip to content

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] optimize dataframe iteration#76

Open
alinelena wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-dataframe-iteration-5717298047122085002
Open

⚡ Bolt: [performance improvement] optimize dataframe iteration#76
alinelena wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
bolt-optimize-dataframe-iteration-5717298047122085002

Conversation

@alinelena

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

💡 What:
Replaced df.iterrows() with df.to_dict('records') when constructing dictionary lookups from the Parquet dataset in verify_processed_omol25.py. Updated downstream pq_row.to_dict() calls to dict(pq_row) since the objects are now native python dictionaries instead of pandas Series.

🎯 Why:
Iterating over large pandas DataFrames using .iterrows() is a known performance anti-pattern. It creates a new Pandas Series object for every single row, adding significant overhead. By converting the entire DataFrame to a list of native Python dictionaries upfront, we completely bypass this serialization overhead during iteration.

📊 Impact:
Significantly faster dictionary comprehension and lower memory overhead when cross-referencing large Parquet datasets, potentially reducing alignment step time by an order of magnitude for millions of records.

🔬 Measurement:
Run python -m pytest tests/test_verify_processed_omol25.py to ensure core correctness logic remains fully unbroken. For benchmarking on real data, run the verify_processed_omol25.py script on a large Parquet/ExtXYZ pair and measure the time spent in the "Loading ExtXYZ file..." step (which occurs immediately after the DataFrame iteration).


PR created automatically by Jules for task 5717298047122085002 started by @alinelena

…fast iteration

Replaced `df.iterrows()` with `df.to_dict('records')` in the verification script.
Iterating over a DataFrame using `iterrows` is an anti-pattern as it instantiates a
new pandas Series object for each row, adding significant overhead on large datasets.
By converting the DataFrame to a list of native Python dictionaries first, we eliminate
this overhead, resulting in drastically faster dictionary comprehension. Downstream
references were also updated to utilize the native dict structure directly.

Co-authored-by: alinelena <3306823+alinelena@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant