docs: Avoid topic clashes for ?mutate and other verbs - #2245
Conversation
Current Aviator status
This pull request is currently open (not queued). How to mergeTo merge this PR, comment
See the real-time status of this PR on the
Aviator webapp.
Use the Aviator Chrome Extension
to see the status of your PR within GitHub.
|
c220f0d to
fa9ed7a
Compare
…clashes for `?mutate` and other verbs
fa9ed7a to
54f7f8f
Compare
bb773d0 to
b3291fd
Compare
|
@krlmlr why did you choose to stop re-exporting here, should duckplyr also stop re-exporting? |
|
Good question, not sure yet. On the upside, this problem is independent of the help pages. |
|
@copilot: Also add tidyr to the "depends". Ensure vignettes can be built. |
Co-authored-by: krlmlr <1741643+krlmlr@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Revdepcheck failures are likely, I can't deal with it now. Also, depending on dplyr and tidyr feels wrong. The clean solution is to not reexport at all, and also to not depend. A coding agent can do this easily, downstream failures will be more difficult to handle but can typically be fixed with one or two lines of code. |
@maelle: Looks like
@noRdis the better choice here, need to remember that for duckplyr.