Skip to content

Conversation

@giudptr
Copy link

@giudptr giudptr commented Dec 1, 2024

Type of change

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Improvement (refactoring and improving code)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation update

Description

Additional context

Signed-off-by: Giulia Di Pietro <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Giulia Di Pietro <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Dec 1, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2024

Oops, it seems you've opened an invalid pull request. No worries, we'll close it for you.

palonso pushed a commit to palonso/palonso.github.io that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2025
Added another GitHub action to check for broken local links on version
of the site that will be deployed.

The `broken-links` action check for broken links considering
documentation files (like INSTALLING.md) and also pages like
[_pages/about.md](https://github.com/alshedivat/al-folio/blob/master/_pages/about.md),
but it can't check for broken links when the link will be handled by
jekyll tags (like in
[_pages/blog.md](https://github.com/alshedivat/al-folio/blob/master/_pages/blog.md).

With `broken-links-site` we can check if all the links that will be used
on the final site that refer to local files are correct. Focusing only
on local files since this would end up calling too many checks for
library files, like
`https://unpkg.com/[email protected]/dist/bootstrap-table.min.css`.

---------

Signed-off-by: George Araújo <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant