Skip to content

Conversation

@isuruf
Copy link
Member

@isuruf isuruf commented Sep 19, 2024

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

@isuruf isuruf added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 19, 2024
@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe/meta.yaml:

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe/meta.yaml) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 19, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

Commits were made to this PR after the automerge label was added. For security reasons, I have disabled automerge by removing the automerge label. Please add the automerge label again (or ask a maintainer to do so) if you'd like to enable automerge again!

@isuruf
Copy link
Member Author

isuruf commented Sep 19, 2024

@conda-forge-admin, rerender

@isuruf isuruf added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 19, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

Commits were made to this PR after the automerge label was added. For security reasons, I have disabled automerge by removing the automerge label. Please add the automerge label again (or ask a maintainer to do so) if you'd like to enable automerge again!

@isuruf isuruf added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 19, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

I considered the following status checks when analyzing this PR:

  • linter: passed
  • azure: failed

Thus the PR was not passing and not merged.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 19, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

Commits were made to this PR after the automerge label was added. For security reasons, I have disabled automerge by removing the automerge label. Please add the automerge label again (or ask a maintainer to do so) if you'd like to enable automerge again!

@isuruf isuruf added the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 19, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the automerge Merge the PR when CI passes label Sep 19, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly conda-forge automerge bot!

Commits were made to this PR after the automerge label was added. For security reasons, I have disabled automerge by removing the automerge label. Please add the automerge label again (or ask a maintainer to do so) if you'd like to enable automerge again!

- {{ cdt('libXft-devel') }} # [linux and tk_variant == 'xft']
- {{ cdt('libpng-devel') }} # [linux and tk_variant == 'xft']
- {{ cdt('libuuid-devel') }} # [linux and tk_variant == 'xft']
- {{ cdt('expat-devel') }} # [linux and tk_variant == 'xft']

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

are we ready in 2024 to remove these CDTs as well?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

xref: #63

test:
requires:
# needs to run emulated tests
- bzip2 # [build_platform != target_platform]

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is very curious.

If this is not needed by the native builds, it must be finding libbzip2 from some other environment and adopting it right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants