Skip to content

Conversation

@eacodegen
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation

Content

Testing

Please check the following before marking your PR as ready for review

  • I have added tests for my changes
  • I have updated the documentation or added new documentation as needed
  • I have read and agree to the Contributor License Agreement

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jan 28, 2025

CG-10379 Parse `PostHog` in JS without `chunk.js`

Look for the largest file

@bagel897 bagel897 marked this pull request as ready for review January 28, 2025 01:23
@bagel897 bagel897 enabled auto-merge (squash) January 28, 2025 01:23
@bagel897 bagel897 merged commit 287466c into develop Jan 28, 2025
8 of 13 checks passed
@bagel897 bagel897 deleted the eagarwal-cg-10379-parse-posthog-in-js-without-chunkjs branch January 28, 2025 01:25
tkfoss pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2025
# Motivation
<!-- Why is this change necessary? -->

# Content
<!-- Please include a summary of the change -->
# Testing
<!-- How was the change tested? -->
# Please check the following before marking your PR as ready for review

- [ ] I have added tests for my changes
- [ ] I have updated the documentation or added new documentation as
needed
- [ ] I have read and agree to the [Contributor License
Agreement](../CLA.md)

Co-authored-by: codegen-bot <[email protected]>
jayhack pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 9, 2025
# Motivation
<!-- Why is this change necessary? -->

# Content
<!-- Please include a summary of the change -->
# Testing
<!-- How was the change tested? -->
# Please check the following before marking your PR as ready for review

- [ ] I have added tests for my changes
- [ ] I have updated the documentation or added new documentation as
needed
- [ ] I have read and agree to the [Contributor License
Agreement](../CLA.md)

Co-authored-by: codegen-bot <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants